| Electronic Components Datasheet Search |
|
OPA691 Datasheet(PDF) 21 Page - Texas Instruments |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPA691 Datasheet(HTML) 21 Page - Texas Instruments |
|
21 / 33 page ![]() OPA2674 SBOS270A − AUGUST 2003 − REVISED MAY 2006 www.ti.com 21 supplies. Evaluating the denominator of Equation 15 (which is the feedback transimpedance) gives an optimal target of 490 Ω. As the signal gain changes, the contribution of the NG × RI term in the feedback transimpedance changes, but the total can be held constant by adjusting RF. Equation 16 gives an approximate equation for optimum RF over signal gain: R F + 490 * NG R I As the desired signal gain increases, this equation eventually suggests a negative RF. A somewhat subjective limit to this adjustment can also be set by holding RG to a minimum value of 20 Ω. Lower values load both the buffer stage at the input and the output stage if RF gets too low actually decreasing the bandwidth. Figure 11 shows the recommended RF versus NG for both ±6V and a single +5V operation. The values for RF versus gain shown here are approximately equal to the values used to generate the Typical Characteristics. They differ in that the optimized values used in the Typical Characteristics are also correcting for board parasitic not considered in the simplified analysis leading to Equation 16. The values shown in Figure 11 give a good starting point for designs where bandwidth optimization is desired. 600 500 400 300 200 Noise Gain 025 10 15 20 5 +5V R G =20Ω ±6V Figure 11. Feedback Resistor vs Noise Gain The total impedance going into the inverting input may be used to adjust the closed-loop signal bandwidth. Inserting a series resistor between the inverting input and the summing junction increases the feedback impedance (the denominator of Equation 15), decreasing the bandwidth. The internal buffer output impedance for the OPA2674 is slightly influenced by the source impedance coming from of the noninverting input terminal. High-source resistors also have the effect of increasing RI, decreasing the bandwidth. For those single-supply applications that develop a midpoint bias at the noninverting input through high valued resistors, the decoupling capacitor is essential for power-supply ripple rejection, noninverting input noise current shunting, and to minimize the high-frequency value for RI in Figure 10. INVERTING AMPLIFIER OPERATION As the OPA2674 is a general-purpose, wideband current-feedback op amp, most of the familiar op amp application circuits are available to the designer. Those dual op amp applications that require considerable flexibility in the feedback element (for example, integrators, transimpedance, and some filters) should consider a unity-gain stable, voltage-feedback amplifier such as the OPA2822, because the feedback resistor is the compensation element for a current-feedback op amp. Wideband inverting operation (and especially summing) is particularly suited to the OPA2674. Figure 12 shows a typical inverting configuration where the I/O impedances and signal gain from Figure 1 are retained in an inverting circuit configuration. 1/2 O P A 267 4 R F 392 Ω R G 97.6 Ω +6V −6V 50 Ω 50 Ω Load V O Power−supply decoupling not shown. V I 50 Ω Source R M 102 Ω Figure 12. Inverting Gain of −4 with Impedance Matching In the inverting configuration, two key design considerations must be noted. First, the gain resistor (RG) becomes part of the signal source input impedance. If input impedance matching is desired (which is beneficial whenever the signal is coupled through a cable, twisted pair, long PCB trace, or other transmission line conductor), it is normally necessary to add an additional matching resistor to ground. RG, by itself, normally is not set to the required input impedance since its value, along with the desired gain, will determine an RF, which may be nonoptimal from a frequency response standpoint. The total input impedance for the source becomes the parallel combination of RG and RM. The second major consideration is that the signal source impedance becomes part of the noise gain equation and has a slight effect on the bandwidth through Equation 15. The values shown in Figure 12 have accounted for this by slightly decreasing RF (from the optimum values) to reoptimize the bandwidth for the noise gain of Figure 12 (NG = 3.98). In the example of Figure 12, the RM value combines in parallel with the external 50 Ω source impedance, yielding an effective driving impedance of 50 Ω || 102Ω = 33.5Ω. This impedance is added in series (16) |
|
Link URL |
| Does ALLDATASHEET help your business so far? [ DONATE ] |
About Alldatasheet | Advertisement | Contact us | Privacy Policy | Link to Datasheet | Link Exchange | Manufacturer List All Rights Reserved©Alldatasheet.com |
| Russian : Alldatasheetru.com | Korean : Alldatasheet.co.kr | Spanish : Alldatasheet.es | French : Alldatasheet.fr | Italian : Alldatasheetit.com Portuguese : Alldatasheetpt.com | Polish : Alldatasheet.pl | Vietnamese : Alldatasheet.vn Indian : Alldatasheet.in | Mexican : Alldatasheet.com.mx | British : Alldatasheet.co.uk | New Zealand : Alldatasheet.co.nz |
|
Family Site : ic2ic.com |
icmetro.com |